Discovery Channel Owes Us An Apology
Written by Brian Miller on October 28, 2009
I have been quite active in the Tea Party movement here in Northeastern Ohio, including helping to organize the largest one in the state, with over 7,000 people in attendance. Amazingly, this event (which happened on a Thursday evening) grew to include a simo-cast from a local radio station and drew such a crowd, it practically shut down the six-lane freeway into town.
I’m not tooting my own horn here, just demonstrating that a majority of the public in is in favor of the Tea Party movement and the values it represents. This was even more evident when over a million people made their way to Washington, D.C. to create the largest protest in American history.
After yet another weekend of Tea Parties where I again addressed and joined thousands of people, I returned home to relax and watch a little TV. I frequently watch shows on the Discovery Channel networks in order to take a break from the daily grind of sit-coms, drama, reality TV and the 24 hour news cycle.
I was watching a show called Hunting the Lost Symbol, which examines the fact vs. fiction about Da Vinci Code author Dan Brown’s latest release. Not to spoil the plot, but one of the main themes involves the Freemasons. The show examines the Freemasons and the public’s skepticism of the organization’s secrete ways. One segment begins talking about conspiracy groups and their stories about the Freemasons in a way comparable to the JFK Assassination and Holocaust Deniers.
As the commentators spoke of these groups, images of JFK in his limo before he was killed were followed by images of Tea Parties, holding signs protesting National Healthcare, and waving “Don’t Tread on Me” Flags. I for one was appalled, and am writing Discovery Channel asking for a public apology. Please join with me in doing the same.
Discovery Communications
Viewer Relations
One Discovery Place
5th Floor
Silver Spring, MD 20910
I have created an on-line petition at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/baddiscovery
My full letter sent to Discovery Channel is as follows:
—
Concerns about Hunting the Lost Symbol by Discovery Channel
I have been a huge fan of the Discovery Channel and its affiliates, including the History Channel, the Military Channel and the sadly canceled Wings Channel. As someone who reads a bit in my spare time, often books of history and biography, I have enjoyed your productions for years. These shows offer a break from the monotony of situational comedies, reality TV, and the 24 hour news cycle. Sadly the integrity of your impartial work has now too been compromised by partisan politics. If political commentary and opinion were what I desired when choosing one of your programs, I would have simply watched a 24 hour news station on instead.
I purchased Dan Brown’s latest book, The Lost Symbol, the day it became available, and when Discovery Channel aired a show investigating the truths found within this story I was thrilled. I found your programs relating to his to previous works to be both informative, and entertaining. This particular show however repeatedly uses political viewpoints that are inconsistent with the political neutrality, and historical accuracy I have come to expect from your organization.
- I found that a number of times, references to the founding fathers creating a constitution that reflected the “Separation of Church and State” to be both inaccurate and disturbing. Nowhere in the Constitution or within the thousands of pages of text related to its drafting is this phrase present. This phrase was used by Thomas Jefferson long after the ratification of the Constitution in a personal communication to a Church in Philadelphia. But it has no correlation to the matter discussed in the show. Not until the Progressive movement nearly 100 years later was the phrase introduced in the record of the Supreme Court. These events all transpired long after the passing of all of the founding fathers, and the use of this phrase was in fact part of a movement to nullify and marginalize the Constitution as an antiquated document.
- A section of the show speaks of fears of conspiracy, and groups who propagate such theories about the Freemasons. During this segment footage of this summer’s Tea Parties was used. A sign protesting National Healthcare and another referencing the 9-12 Project were shown to reflect members of “Conspiracy Groups”. These images are not only completely out of context, but subliminally attempt to demonize a group of people who stand with over 52% of the American public in opposition to the concept of a Government Operated Healthcare System. Have you no shame?
It takes only a few moments searching the internet to see that your company’s CEO Judith McHale was placed into office of your organization after working for NBC, whose parent company GE is working very closely with the current Presidential Administration. Can one assume that this nexus is now involved in tainting the integrity of one of the last non-political, non-biased, and most educational networks left, in order to push their political agenda?
I hope that this was a simple error within the production crew itself, and can be remedied in keeping with your organization’s long track record of accuracy.
I respectfully request that an apology be issued to the public at large, and directed towards the millions of people who have exercised their First Amendment rights to free speech and participated in Tea Parties this past year.









This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments (3)
Doug Indeap
October 28th, 2009 at 3:18 pm
The phrase “separation of church and state” is but a metaphor to describe the underlying principle of the First Amendment and the no-religious-test clause of the Constitution. The absence of the phrase in the text of the Constitution assumes much importance, it seems, only to those who may have once labored under the misimpression the words appeared there and later learned of their mistake. To those familiar with the Constitution, the absence of the metaphor commonly used to describe one of its principles is no more consequential than the absence of other phrases (e.g., Bill of Rights, separation of powers, checks and balances, fair trial, religious liberty) used to describe other undoubted Constitutional principles.
Some try to pass off the Supreme Court's decision in Everson v. Board of Education as simply a misreading of Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists. That letter, though, played but a small part in the Court's decision. Indeed, the Court mentioned it only in passing after stating its conclusion based on a lengthy and detailed discussion (encompassing many pages and many footnotes) of the historical context in which the First Amendment was developed. The metaphor "separation of church and state" was but a handy catch phrase to describe the upshot of its conclusion. The Court's reading of the First Amendment in this regard was unanimous; all nine Justices agreed on that much, but split 5-4 on whether the Amendment precludes states from paying for transportation of students to religious schools.
Perhaps even more than Thomas Jefferson, James Madison influenced the Court's view. Madison, who had a central role in drafting the Constitution and the First Amendment, confirmed that he understood them to "[s]trongly guard[] . . . the separation between Religion and Government." Madison, Detached Memoranda (~1820). He made plain, too, that they guarded against more than just laws creating state sponsored churches or imposing a state religion. Mindful that old habits die hard and that tendencies of citizens and politicians could and sometimes did lead them to entangle government and religion (e.g., "the appointment of chaplains to the two houses of Congress" and "for the army and navy" and "[r]eligious proclamations by the Executive recommending thanksgivings and fasts"), he considered the question whether these were "consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom" and responded: "In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative. The Constitution of the United States forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion."
The First Amendment embodies the simple, just idea that each of us should be free to exercise his or her religious views without expecting that the government will endorse or promote those views and without fearing that the government will endorse or promote the religious views of others. By keeping government and religion separate, the establishment clause serves to protect the freedom of all to exercise their religion. Reasonable people may differ, of course, on how these principles should be applied in particular situations, but the principles are hardly to be doubted. Moreover, they are good, sound principles that should be nurtured and defended, not attacked. Efforts to transform our secular government into some form of religion-government partnership should be resisted by every patriot.
Dig Deeper
October 28th, 2009 at 5:53 pm
While the "Separation of Church and State" was not correctly framed in the program. I noticed that the issue of discrediting the Tea Party movement was not addressed. I take it you agree that Discover Channel was way off the range on this.
The founders understood both the importance of church to provide a moral campus for the populous, combined with education. Without these two core principals "Morals" and "Knowledge" our democratic republic is doomed to fail. This was made clear in multiple writings of both Madison and Jefferson. the use of this concept has been twisted and perverted for the expressed purpose of reducing these to key requirements of a free society.
john k.
October 28th, 2009 at 8:07 pm
discovery channel is going to hear from me.
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.