<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Evading Constitutionality Questions on Mandates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/</link>
	<description>The Pop Culture Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:01:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john k.</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>john k.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10411#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>haha! maybe my credit card agreements have clauses like that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha! maybe my credit card agreements have clauses like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Rizzuto</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Rizzuto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10411#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Oh noooz! You&#039;re right! I guess there&#039;s no such thing as enumerated powers Tom. Obviously what the framers meant to do in Article 1 Section 8 is imbue the congress with unlimited power in the first clause, thus rendering all other clauses that follow moot. 
 
I know that that very idea is antithetical to limited governance, but hey, what&#039;d those old dead white dudes know anyway? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh noooz! You&#039;re right! I guess there&#039;s no such thing as enumerated powers Tom. Obviously what the framers meant to do in Article 1 Section 8 is imbue the congress with unlimited power in the first clause, thus rendering all other clauses that follow moot. </p>
<p>I know that that very idea is antithetical to limited governance, but hey, what&#039;d those old dead white dudes know anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffStone</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffStone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10411#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>Tom, you found it. It was hidden for all these years, but alas, you found it. 
 
Hurrah. 
 
Congress can tell us to do anything and everything. That is what Liberty is all about. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, you found it. It was hidden for all these years, but alas, you found it. </p>
<p>Hurrah. </p>
<p>Congress can tell us to do anything and everything. That is what Liberty is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10411#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>Defence refers to the military, general welfare refers back to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. 
 
Where here does it say that the Congress shall have the power to force people to purchase something that they tell them to and if the people do not, fine them or put them in jail? 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defence refers to the military, general welfare refers back to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. </p>
<p>Where here does it say that the Congress shall have the power to force people to purchase something that they tell them to and if the people do not, fine them or put them in jail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10411#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution: &quot;The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;&quot; 
 
Oops. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution: &quot;The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;&quot; </p>
<p>Oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Democrats Evading Constitutionality Questions on Mandates &#124; Parcbench -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Democrats Evading Constitutionality Questions on Mandates &#124; Parcbench -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10411#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WJ Fuoco, The Wilkow Majority. The Wilkow Majority said: Democrats are Evading the Constitutionality Question: http://tinyurl.com/ybr6u3u #tcot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by WJ Fuoco, The Wilkow Majority. The Wilkow Majority said: Democrats are Evading the Constitutionality Question: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ybr6u3u" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ybr6u3u</a> #tcot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samp</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/20/democrats-evading-constitutionality-questions-on-mandates/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Samp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10411#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>Like the idea of health care reform.  Do not at all like the ideas put forth in this version of health care reform. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the idea of health care reform.  Do not at all like the ideas put forth in this version of health care reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
