<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parcbench &#187; Sean Hannity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parcbench.com/tag/sean-hannity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parcbench.com</link>
	<description>The Pop Culture Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:18:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Odd Couple?</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2010/06/08/odd-couple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parcbench.com/2010/06/08/odd-couple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bmusterman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ParcLIVE!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elton John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james carville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rudy giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rush limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=20942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the surface, I agree, it probably does seem very odd. A 59-year-old Rush Limbaugh marries a cute 33-year-old, Kathryn Rogers. Even seemingly stranger, still, he has Elton John perform at his wedding!
The tabloids are abuzz with critical gawkers.
OK, for all you “nay-sayers,” Rush can marry whomever he wants. He&#8217;s had three failed marriages. He [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.parcbench.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/limbaugh_rogers.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-20973" title="limbaugh_rogers" src="http://www.parcbench.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/limbaugh_rogers.jpg" alt="limbaugh_rogers" width="260" height="190" /></a>On the surface, I agree, it probably does seem very odd. A 59-year-old Rush Limbaugh marries a cute 33-year-old, Kathryn Rogers. Even seemingly stranger, still, he has Elton John perform at his wedding!</p>
<p>The tabloids are abuzz with critical gawkers.</p>
<p>OK, for all you “nay-sayers,” Rush can marry whomever he wants. He&#8217;s had three failed marriages. He deserves to be happy. The age difference, though great, is certainly not insurmountable.</p>
<p>According to his new wife, it’s the age difference that makes it work.</p>
<p>The couple hosted a rehearsal dinner luau for 400 close friends and family at the hotel Friday night and the wedding took place at Limbaugh&#8217;s beachfront mansion at an undisclosed time.</p>
<p>Guests at the wedding, included former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, former Clinton adviser James Carville and Fox News&#8217; Sean Hannity.</p>
<p>Rush can invite whomever he wants to perform at his wedding. Elton John is fantastic! If I had the means, I would certainly hire him to play for an event. Just think of what would happen to our economy if we based our purchases on the seller’s lifestyle. There would be no commerce to speak of.</p>
<p>As for Elton John, last I checked he wasn’t hurting for money. He certainly didn’t need the $1 million dollars. If he had a problem with it, he could have refused.</p>
<p>I, for one, don’t know what all the fuss is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parcbench.com/2010/06/08/odd-couple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why it pays to GO ROGUE!</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/19/why-it-pays-to-go-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/19/why-it-pays-to-go-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin McCullough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ParcLIVE!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oprah winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saturday night live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=10600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The producers at Oprah Winfrey attempted to advise the big O to not have Sarah Palin on her show prior to booking the former VP Candidate. Evidently a steady stream of higher than normal negative e-mails were coming in and the producers felt it would be unwise to have such a divisive character mar the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-10614" title="Sarah Palin with Trigg2" src="http://www.parcbench.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Sarah-Palin-with-Trigg2.jpg" alt="Sarah Palin with Trigg2" width="540" height="342" /></p>
<div>The producers at Oprah Winfrey attempted to advise the big O to not have Sarah Palin on her show prior to booking the former VP Candidate. Evidently a steady stream of higher than normal negative e-mails were coming in and the producers felt it would be unwise to have such a divisive character mar the pristine purity of America&#8217;s queen of talk.</p>
<p>At such a suggestion O just waived her hand and uttered, &#8220;shush child&#8230; I know what I&#8217;m doing.&#8221;</p>
<p>And indeed she did&#8230;</p>
<p>Sarah Palin gave Oprah Winfrey the highest ratings she&#8217;s had in nearly 3 years.</p>
<p>Sure <a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-11-18-sexy-sarah-gives-the-big-o-big-ratings" target="_blank">gossip mongers can&#8217;t deal with the fact</a> that Sarah has such a following. But ladies and gents let&#8217;s just be clear about the following facts:</p>
<p>1. Sarah Palin added to the GOP ticket closes McCain&#8217;s loss from an expected 30% to only 7%.<br />
2. Sarah Palin draws crowds equivalent to Barack Obama in final weeks of campaign.<br />
3. Sarah Palin lands Saturday Night Live its largest audience in the history of the show.<br />
4. Sarah Palin&#8217;s endorsement takes a Democratic landslide victory away in NY23 &#8211; where the result is still not final.<br />
5. Sarah Palin forces Letterman to apologize for being&#8230; well&#8230; his pervy self.<br />
6. Sarah Palin&#8217;s book tops NYTimes, Amazon and hosts of other best seller lists six weeks before its published.<br />
7. Sarah Palin gives Oprah Winfrey and Sean Hannity record television numbers this week.</p>
<p>The reason that Newsweek will soon learn that thieving a photo and <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2009/11/feminists_silen.html" target="_blank">attempting to frame Sarah as a ditzy sexpot on their most current cover</a>, will only backfire.</p>
<p>Sarah Palin will not be the nominee in 2012. But she may be on the ticket, and even if she isn&#8217;t she will be a force to be reckoned with. And you&#8217;ve just seen the evidence as to exactly why that is the case&#8230;</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/11/19/why-it-pays-to-go-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girl Power! Sarah Palin &amp; Ronald Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/10/21/girl-power-sarah-palin-ronald-reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/10/21/girl-power-sarah-palin-ronald-reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rush limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parcbench.com/?p=8572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Sarah Palin will appear on Oprah.
I can’t remember a time when one person—outside of the presidency and not behind the golden EIB microphone—wielded as much influence as Sarah Palin.
Those more aware during the formative years of the Reagan Revolution, I suspect, would rightly point to Ronald Wilson Reagan. A staunch supporter of Goldwater during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9149" title="sarah_palin_2" src="http://www.parcbench.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/sarah_palin_2.jpg" alt="sarah_palin_2" width="232" height="222" />So Sarah Palin will appear on Oprah.</p>
<p>I can’t remember a time when one person—outside of the presidency and not behind the golden EIB microphone—wielded as much influence as Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>Those more aware during the formative years of the Reagan Revolution, I suspect, would rightly point to Ronald Wilson Reagan. A staunch supporter of Goldwater during the ’64 election, Reagan’s singular power helped wrest control of the Republican Party from the moderate, squishy Rockefellers.</p>
<p>Nixon’s animosity towards him and California’s budgetary woes kept Reagan busy and out of the national spotlight for nearly a decade. But, it was the success of his ideas in righting the Golden State that thrust him back into national prominence during the ’76 election. Had he started his campaign earlier, Reagan’s threat to unseat Ford, like he would later unseat Carter, might have worked.</p>
<p>His failed bid for the presidency made him more influential, not less. Pundits and leaders found his wisdom compelling during the disastrous Carter years. And, after those four very long years, the entire nation turned to him to restore American ascendancy.</p>
<p>So, we have Reagan. A man who, by the force of his ideas, influenced—no, changed—the entire national debate.</p>
<p>During the Bush I, Clinton and Bush II years, we had Rush who could speak for the normally silent majority. The vocal minority—the Code Pinkers, Michael Moore, and assorted community organizers—were loud but had very little sticks. They could agitate but not turn the tide of welfare reform, Bush II re-election, Afghanistan and Iraq. It wasn’t until a veritable cosmic alignment of Bush and war weariness gave Barack Obama the presidency and the Democrats the Congress that the left wing lucked out.</p>
<p>We still have Rush, joined now by members of his chorale: Hannity, Levin, Beck, Hewitt and others. As far as we know, most of these talkers, like Rush, won’t deign to take the pay cut and enter elective politics. So, as powerful as they may be, they won’t ever pull the sword from Reagan’s stone.</p>
<p>For the gelatinous, invertebrates of the mythical “new majority,” that Reagan’s mantle will continue to gather dust is a great thing. They say that there must be a modern way forward without the heavy footsteps of the Gipper to lead the way. Righty pundits, on the other hand, fret that for all the potential Republican pols lining up for 2012, there’s not a Reagan amongst them.</p>
<p>They simply can’t see the tree for the forest.</p>
<p>A voice rings out against Obamacare’s inevitable rationing panels—correctly termed death panels, for that’s what they’ve become in Britain and Canada. That voice rationally raises concerns that Obama’s neglecting Afghanistan. With a logic that cannot be denied, dulcet tones eviscerate the Administration’s so-called energy policy—an energy policy that leads to the decline of the dollar and American power.</p>
<p>Sure, she’s been knocked around and mocked. So was Reagan. She’s been forsaken by the Republican intelligentsia and elite. So was Reagan. She has the ability to bring the ruling Democrats to their knees. So did Reagan.</p>
<p>Reagan was one of our greatest and most successful presidents.</p>
<p>Palin could be, too.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong><em>Want to respond? Email editor@parcbench.com.</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/10/21/girl-power-sarah-palin-ronald-reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
